Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 20-1634 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1634
Decided
May 11, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CENTRIPETAL NETWORKS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

2020-1634, 2020-1829

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01386, IPR2018-01512.

JUDGMENT

JAMES R. HANNAH, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Menlo Park, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by PAUL J. ANDRE; JEFFREY PRICE, New York, NY. JEFFREY BLAKE, Merchant & Gould PC, Atlanta, GA, argued for appellee. Also represented by DANIEL W. MCDONALD, Minneapolis, MN; MICHAEL WAGNER, Denver, CO.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and

REYNA, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 11, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 20-1634 (Fed. Cir. May 11, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1634-20210511
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1634-20210511

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error