Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation, No. 20-1587 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1587
Decided
October 13, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit QUALCOMM INCORPORATED,

Appellant

v.

INTEL CORPORATION,

Cross-Appellant

2020-1587, 2020-1588, 2020-1654

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-01152, IPR2018-01153.

JUDGMENT

ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Jones Day, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT BREETZ, DAVID B. COCHRAN, DAVID MICHAEL MAIORANA, JOSEPH M. SAUER, Cleveland, OH; MATTHEW JOHNSON, JOSHUA R. NIGHTINGALE, Pittsburgh, PA; JENNIFER L. SWIZE, Washington, DC. JAMES MURPHY DOWD, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for cross-appellant.

2Also represented by DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH, Washington, DC; KELLI POWELL, Boston, MA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 13, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Qualcomm Incorporated v. Intel Corporation, No. 20-1587 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 13, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1587-20211013
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1587-20211013

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.