Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

National Products, Inc. v. High Gear Specialties Inc., No. 20-1577 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1577
Decided
December 10, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit NATIONAL PRODUCTS, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

HIGH GEAR SPECIALTIES INC,

Defendant-Appellee

2020-1577

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida in No. 6:18-cv-00543-RBD-DCI, Judge Roy B. Dalton Jr.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN THOMAS MCMICHAEL, Fenwick & West LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DAVID KEITH TELLEKSON, JONATHAN GORDON TAMIMI, JESSICA KAEMPF.

RYAN SANTURRI, Allen, Dyer, Doppelt, Milbrath & Gilchrist, P.A., Orlando, FL, argued for defendant-appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and STOLL,

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

National Products, Inc. v. High Gear Specialties Inc., No. 20-1577 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1577-20201210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1577-20201210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error