Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Express Mobile, Inc. v. Egrove Systems Corporation, No. 20-1511 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1511
Decided
December 10, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EXPRESS MOBILE, INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

EGROVE SYSTEMS CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellant

2020-1511, 2020-1617

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:17-cv-00703-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

TIMOTHY DEVLIN, Devlin Law Firm, Wilmington, DE, for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by ROBERT DEAN KIDDIE, JR.

AMIT AGARWAL, Law Office of Amit Agarwal, Tampa, FL, for defendant-appellant. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 10, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Express Mobile, Inc. v. Egrove Systems Corporation, No. 20-1511 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 10, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1511-20201210
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1511-20201210

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error