Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Gallogly v. US, No. 20-150 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2020)

Dismissed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-150
Decided
October 19, 2020
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit REBECCA GALLOGLY,

Petitioner

v.

UNITED STATES,

Respondent

2020-150

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW, Senior Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams.

ON PETITION AND MOTION

Before DYK, WALLACH, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges.

O R D E R

Rebecca Gallogly petitions for a writ of mandamus directing the United States Court of Federal Claims to docket submissions entitled “Plaintiff’s Amended Objections to Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment,” ECF No. 2-1 at 10–28, and “Motion for Leave2 2 GALLOGLY v. US

to File Amended Objections,” ECF No. 2-1 at 29–45. She also moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Review of the docket before the Court of Federal Claims shows that these documents were entered on the docket on September 14, 2020. See Gallogly v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Aug. 28, 2020), ECF No. 33. Additionally, on September 21, 2020, that court granted Dr. Gallogly’s motion for leave to file amended objections. See Gallogly v. United States, No. 1:20-cv-00261-MCW (Fed. Cl. Sept. 21, 2020), ECF No. 35. Because Dr. Gallogly has received the requested relief, we deny her petition as moot. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as moot. (2) The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

FOR THE COURT

October 19, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

s25

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Gallogly v. US, No. 20-150 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 19, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-150-20201019
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-150-20201019

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.