Fed. Cir.

Cocona, Inc. v. VF Outdoor, LLC, No. 20-1448 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2021)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 20-1448
Decided: March 4, 2021
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

COCONA, INC.,

Appellant

VF OUTDOOR, LLC,

Cross-Appellant

2020-1448, 2020-1534

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00190.

JUDGMENT

JASON STEWART JACKSON, Kutak Rock LLP, Denver, CO, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHAD T. NITTA.

PETER GERGELY, Merchant & Gould P.C., New York, NY, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by RACHEL C. HUGHEY, Minneapolis, MN. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 4, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Cocona, Inc. v. VF Outdoor, LLC, No. 20-1448 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2021).

Record ID: CAFC-20-1448-20210304
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1448-20210304

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error