Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

C.A. Casyso GmbH v. Hemosonics LLC, No. 20-1444 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2022)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1444
Decided
June 13, 2022
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

C.A. CASYSO GMBH,

Appellant

v.

HEMOSONICS LLC,

Appellee

KATHERINE K. VIDAL, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor 2020-1444

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00950.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER DRYER, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, for appellant. BRIAN W. NOLAN, Mayer Brown, LLP, New York, NY,

2argued for appellee. Also represented by LISA M. FERRI; YING-ZI YANG.

MONICA BARNES LATEEF, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, WILLIAM LAMARCA, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 13, 2022 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

C.A. Casyso GmbH v. Hemosonics LLC, No. 20-1444 (Fed. Cir. June 13, 2022).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1444-20220613
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1444-20220613

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.