Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Chen v. Jung, No. 20-1255 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1255
Decided
September 16, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DEGUI CHEN,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

MICHAEL E. JUNG, CHARLES L. SAWYERS,

Defendants-Appellees

2020-1255

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:18-cv-02015-RGK-KS, Judge R. Gary Klausner.

JUDGMENT

YIXIN H. TANG, Upadhye Cwik LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by SHASHANK UPADHYE, BRENT ALLEN BATZER.

MARK MICHAEL SUPKO, Crowell & Moring, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by EMILY KUWAHARA, Los Angeles, CA; GABRIEL MORGAN RAMSEY, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 16, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Chen v. Jung, No. 20-1255 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 16, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1255-20200916
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1255-20200916

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.