Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Princeton Digital Image v. Ubisoft Entertainment S.A., No. 20-1204 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1204
Decided
November 9, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PRINCETON DIGITAL IMAGE CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UBISOFT ENTERTAINMENT SA, UBISOFT, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2020-1204

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13-cv-00335-LPS-CJB, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

JONAS R. MCDAVIT, Desmarais LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM FINDLAY, FRANCESCO SILLETTA.

MICHELLE LYONS MARRIOTT, Erise IP, P.A., Overland Park, KS, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by ERIC ALLAN BURESH. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, SCHALL, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 9, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Princeton Digital Image v. Ubisoft Entertainment S.A., No. 20-1204 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 9, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1204-20201109
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1204-20201109

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error