Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Artsana USA, Inc., No. 20-1102 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1102
Decided
September 8, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit KOLCRAFT ENTERPRISES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ARTSANA USA, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

CHICCO USA, INC.,

Defendant 2020-1102

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 1:09-cv-03339, Judge Edmond E. Chang.

JUDGMENT

GEORGE PAZUNIAK, O'Kelly, Ernst, & Bielli, LLC, Wilmington, DE, argued for defendant-appellant. RAYMOND P. NIRO, JR., Niro McAndrews LLC, Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by KYLE WALLENBERG.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 8, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Artsana USA, Inc., No. 20-1102 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 8, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1102-20200908
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1102-20200908

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.