Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

International Technologies v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 20-1077 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1077
Decided
September 3, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES AND

SYSTEMS CORPORATION, DBA ID TECH,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG

ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2020-1077

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 8:17-cv-01748-DOC-JDE, Judge David O. Carter.

JUDGMENT

JOHN D. HAYNES, Alston & Bird LLP, Atlanta, GA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by PATRICK FLINN, HOLLY HAWKINS SAPORITO; JAMES ABE, Los Angeles, CA; DANIEL L. HUYNH, Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP, Atlanta, GA. RUFFIN B. CORDELL, Fish & Richardson PC, Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also

2represented by CHRISTOPHER DRYER, MICHAEL J. MCKEON, MATTHEW MOSTELLER; FRANCIS J. ALBERT, San Diego, CA; CHRISTOPHER WOOD KENNERLY, Paul Hastings LLP, Palo Alto, CA; ELIZABETH BRANN, San Diego, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LINN and

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 3, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

International Technologies v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., No. 20-1077 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 3, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1077-20200903
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1077-20200903

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error