Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Medicinova, Inc. v. Genzyme Corporation, No. 20-1064 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1064
Decided
December 14, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit MEDICINOVA, INC., A DELAWARE

CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GENZYME CORPORATION, A MASSACHUSETTS

CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee

2020-1064

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in No. 3:14-cv-02513-JLSKSC, Judge Janis L. Sammartino.

JUDGMENT

BRUCE G. CHAPMAN, Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DON PELTO, Washington, DC; MATTHEW G. HALGREN, MARK GERARD RACKERS, San Diego, CA.

FRANCIS DIGIOVANNI, Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Wilmington, DE, argued for defendant-appellee. Also

2represented by MICHAEL CURT LAMBERT, THATCHER A. RAHMEIER; RABIYA KADER, Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Medicinova, Inc. v. Genzyme Corporation, No. 20-1064 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1064-20201214
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1064-20201214

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.