Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Sabin, No. 20-1055 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1055
Decided
October 6, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IN RE: ROBERT SABIN,

Appellant 2020-1055

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 12/661,964.

JUDGMENT

JOHN FRANCIS VODOPIA, John F. Vodopia, PC, Huntington, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ALFRED M. WALKER, Alfred M. Walker PC, Melville, NY.

MAUREEN DONOVAN QUELER, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Sabin, No. 20-1055 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 6, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1055-20201006
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1055-20201006

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.