Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

T-Jat Systems 2006 Ltd. v. Expedia Group, Inc., No. 20-1010 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2021)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 20-1010
Decided
March 8, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

T-JAT SYSTEMS 2006 LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

EXPEDIA GROUP, INC., ORBITZ WORLDWIDE,

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2020-1010

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:16-cv-00581-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

JUDGMENT

GUY YONAY, Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by DANIEL JOSEPH MELMAN. THEODORE J. ANGELIS, K&L Gates LLP, Seattle, WA, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by NICHOLAS F. LENNING, ELIZABETH WEISKOPF.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, LINN, and MOORE, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 8, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

T-Jat Systems 2006 Ltd. v. Expedia Group, Inc., No. 20-1010 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 8, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-20-1010-20210308
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-20-1010-20210308

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error