Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Provepharm Inc. v. Wista Laboratories Ltd., No. 19-2372 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2372
Decided
December 14, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

PROVEPHARM INC.,

Appellant

v.

WISTA LABORATORIES LTD.,

Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2019-2372, 2019-2373

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2018-00182, IPR2018-00323.

JUDGMENT

CHRISTOPHER RICCIUTI, Oblon, McClelland, Maier and Neustadt, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by TIA FENTON, GRACE KIM.

2NATHAN R. SPEED, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by RICHARD GIUNTA, ERIC J. RUTT, EDWARD R. GATES.

PETER JOHN SAWERT, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Provepharm Inc. v. Wista Laboratories Ltd., No. 19-2372 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 14, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-2372-20201214
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-2372-20201214

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.