Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wirtgen GmbH v. ITC, No. 19-2320 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2320
Decided
November 10, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

WIRTGEN GMBH, JOSEPH VOGELE AG,

WIRTGEN GROUP HOLDING GMBH, WIRTGEN

AMERICA, INC.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

CATERPILLAR INC., CATERPILLAR PAVING

PRODUCTS, INC.,

Intervenors

2019-2320

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1088.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL E. JOFFRE, Sterne Kessler Goldstein & Fox, PLLC, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by PAUL ASHLEY AINSWORTH, WILLIAM MILLIKEN, DANIEL YONAN, DONALD BANOWIT, RALPH WILSON POWERS, III; MARK ANDREW KILGORE, RYAN D. LEVY, SETH R.

2OGDEN, WILLIAM E. SEKYI, JOHN FRANCIS TRIGGS, Patterson Intellectual Property Law, PC, Nashville, TN. HOUDA MORAD, Office of General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON.

LUKE MCCAMMON, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by JAMES R. BARNEY, MAREESA ARNITA FREDERICK.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 10, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wirtgen GmbH v. ITC, No. 19-2320 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 10, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-2320-20201110
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-2320-20201110

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.