Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Greatbatch Ltd. v. AVX Corporation, No. 19-2314 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2314
Decided
July 14, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GREATBATCH LTD.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant

v.

AVX CORPORATION, AVX FILTERS

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellants

2019-2314, 2020-1225

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:13-cv-00723-LPS, Chief Judge Leonard P. Stark.

JUDGMENT

JAMES RAYMOND MULDOON, Harris Beach PLLC, Syracuse, NY, argued for plaintiff-cross-appellant. Also represented by NEAL SLIFKIN, LAURA SMALLEY, Pittsford, NY. HEATHER B. REPICKY, Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP, Boston, MA, argued for defendants-appellants. Also represented by RONALD E. CAHILL.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, REYNA and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

July 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Greatbatch Ltd. v. AVX Corporation, No. 19-2314 (Fed. Cir. July 14, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-2314-20200714
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-2314-20200714

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error