Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

J.S.T. Corporation v. ITC, No. 19-2308 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2308
Decided
July 10, 2020
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

J.S.T. CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

ROBERT BOSCH LLC, ROBERT BOSCH,

SISTEMAS AUTOMATRICES, S.A. DE C.V.,

FOXCONN INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGY, LTD.,

Intervenors

2019-2308

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1043.

Decided: July 10, 2020

JONATHAN MASSEY, Massey & Gail LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by CHRISTOPHER LAURENCE MAY; KENNETH GOLDMAN, San Francisco, CA; KEITH SCALA, Myers Bradford, Washington, DC.

22 J.S.T. CORPORATION v. ITC

CLINT A. GERDINE, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG.

MARK S. DAVIES, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Washington, DC, argued for intervenors. Also represented by JORDAN COYLE, CHRISTOPHER J. HIGGINS, KATHERINE M. KOPP; ALEXANDRA BURSAK, MATTHEW R. SHAHABIAN, New York, NY; MICHAEL CHOW, Irvine, CA; BAS DE BLANK, Menlo Park, CA.

Before LOURIE, SCHALL, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

J.S.T Corporation (“JST”) appeals a determination by the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) finding no violation of 19 U.S.C. § 1337. Specifically, JST argues that the Commission erred in finding claims 2, 4, and 9–10 of U.S. Patent No. 7,004,766 to be not infringed and invalid.

We agree with the Commission’s construction of “first holes” “to require that the first (elongated) holes at the periphery of the tine plate in the longitudinal direction must be closer to the periphery of the tine plate than any second hole.” J.A. 38. Because it is undisputed that the accused products do not infringe under this construction, we affirm the Commission’s finding of noninfringement.

We also agree with the Commission’s construction of “contact legs” to include legs that connect to ground and affirm the Commission’s holding that the asserted claims were anticipated by the Tyco Docking Station Connector.

AFFIRMED

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

J.S.T. Corporation v. ITC, No. 19-2308 (Fed. Cir. July 10, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-2308-20200710
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-2308-20200710

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.