Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Genentech, Inc. v. Amgen Inc., No. 19-2156 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2156
Decided
March 6, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

GENENTECH, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

CITY OF HOPE,

Plaintiff

v.

AMGEN INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-2156

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:18-cv-00924-CFC, Judge Colm F. Connolly.

JUDGMENT

ROBERT J. GUNTHER, JR., Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM F. LEE, ANDREW J. DANFORD, Boston, MA; DARALYN JEANNINE DURIE, Durie Tangri LLP, San Francisco, CA. JEFFREY A. LAMKEN, MoloLamken LLP, Washington,

2DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by MICHAEL GREGORY PATTILLO, JR., LUCAS M. WALKER; ORION ARMON, Cooley LLP, Broomfield, CO; MICHELLE S. RHYU, DANIEL JEDEDIAH KNAUSS, BENJAMIN S. LIN, ALISSA WOOD, Palo Alto, CA; BRIAN KAO, LOIS KWASIGROCH, WENDY A. WHITEFORD, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Genentech, Inc. v. Amgen Inc., No. 19-2156 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-2156-20200306
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-2156-20200306

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.