Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC, No. 19-2117 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2020)

Granted
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-2117
Decided
May 5, 2020
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Order on Motion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CIENA CORPORATION,

Appellant

v.

OYSTER OPTICS, LLC,

Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor 2019-2117

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2018-00070.

ON MOTION

Before MOORE, O’MALLEY, and STOLL, Circuit Judges.

22 CIENA CORPORATION v. OYSTER OPTICS, LLC

O R D E R

The Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office requests to reissue the court’s nonprecedential order, dated January 28, 2020, as precedential.

Upon consideration thereof, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The request is granted. The precedential order issues concurrently herewith.

FOR THE COURT

May 5, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ciena Corporation v. Oyster Optics, LLC, No. 19-2117 (Fed. Cir. May 5, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-2117-20200505
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-2117-20200505

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.