Ultratec, Inc. v. Captioncall, LLC, No. 19-1998 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2020) — Rule 36 Judgment

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ULTRATEC, INC.,

Appellant

CAPTIONCALL, LLC,

Appellee

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Intervenor

2019-1998, 2019-1999, 2019-2001, 2019-2002

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2013-00540, IPR2013-00541, IPR2013-00544, IPR2013-00545.

JUDGMENT

KRISTIN GRAHAM NOEL, Quarles & Brady, LLP, Madison, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARTHA JAHN SNYDER, ANTHONY ALLEN TOMASELLI.

2PRATIK A. SHAH, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by Z.W. JULIUS CHEN, RACHEL J. ELSBY; MICHAEL P. KAHN, CAITLIN ELIZABETH OLWELL, MICHAEL NASSER PETEGORSKY, New York, NY; RUBEN H. MUNOZ, Philadelphia, PA. FRANCES LYNCH, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for intervenor. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FARHEENA YASMEEN RASHEED, MOLLY R. SILFEN.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE and

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Cite this opinion

Ultratec, Inc. v. Captioncall, LLC, No. 19-1998 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 14, 2020).

Record ID

CAFC-19-1998-20201014

Permalink

https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1998-20201014

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.