Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Canon Inc. v. ITC, No. 19-1950 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1950
Decided
April 20, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
3 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

CANON INC., CANON U.S.A., INC., CANON

VIRGINIA, INC.,

Appellants

v.

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION,

Appellee

ASTER GRAPHICS, INC., JIANGXI YIBO E-TECH

COMPANY LIMITED, ASTER GRAPHICS

COMPANY, LTD., NINESTAR CORPORATION,

NINESTAR IMAGE TECH LIMITED, NINESTAR

TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, LTD., STATIC

CONTROL COMPONENTS, INC., PRINT-RITE N.A.,

INC., UNION TECHNOLOGY INTERNATIONAL

(M.C.O.) CO. LTD., PRINT-RITE UNICORN IMAGE

PRODUCTS CO. LTD.,

Intervenors

2019-1950

Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-1106.

JUDGMENT

2MICHAEL P. SANDONATO, Venable LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellants. Also represented by SETH BOESHORE, DENNIS MCMAHON, ANDREW KUTAS; EDMUND JOHN HAUGHEY, III, Washington, DC. CLINT A. GERDINE, Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI, WAYNE W. HERRINGTON, SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG.

NICOLE A. SAHARSKY, Mayer Brown LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all intervenors. Intervenors Ninestar Corporation, Ninestar Image Tech Limited, Ninestar Technology Company, Ltd., Static Control Components, Inc. also represented by GARY HNATH, BRYAN NESE, MINH NGUYENDANG; LEI MEI, EDWARD NAIDICH, Mei & Mark LLP, Washington, DC. BARBARA A. MURPHY, Foster, Murphy, Altman & Nickel, PC, Washington, DC, for intervenors Aster Graphics, Inc., Jiangxi Yibo E-Tech Company Limited, Aster Graphics Company, Ltd. Also represented by SUSAN KOEGEL.

STEVEN EUGENE ADKINS, McGuireWoods LLP, Washington, DC, for intervenors Print-Rite N.A., Inc., Union Technology International (M.C.O.) Co. Ltd., Print-Rite Unicorn Image Products Co. Ltd. Also represented by BENJAMIN C. HSING, New York, NY.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 20, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Canon Inc. v. ITC, No. 19-1950 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 20, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1950-20200420
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1950-20200420

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.