Fed. Cir.

BIG Baboon, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., No. 19-1928 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 2, 2020)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 19-1928
Decided: September 2, 2020
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BIG BABOON, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

SAP AMERICA, INC., HP INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2019-1928

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:17-cv-02082-HSG, Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr.

JUDGMENT

LANCE REICH, Kolesar & Leatham, Las Vegas, NV, argued for plaintiff-appellant. J. CHRISTOPHER CARRAWAY, Klarquist Sparkman, LLP, Portland, OR, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by KLAUS H. HAMM. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, O’MALLEY, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

September 2, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

BIG Baboon, Inc. v. SAP America, Inc., No. 19-1928 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 2, 2020).

Record ID: CAFC-19-1928-20200902
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1928-20200902

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error