Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Power-Packer North America v. G.W. Lisk Company, Inc., No. 19-1902 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 13, 2021)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1902
Decided
April 13, 2021
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit POWER-PACKER NORTH AMERICA, INC., DBA

GITS MANUFACTURING CO.,

Appellant

v.

G.W. LISK COMPANY, INC.,

Cross-Appellant

2019-1902, 2019-1965

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-02035.

JUDGMENT

JONATHAN H. MARGOLIES, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP, Milwaukee, WI, argued for appellant. Also represented by KATHERINE W. SCHILL; KEVIN MORAN, Waukesha, WI. WILLIAM R. PETERSON, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Houston, TX, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by JULIE S. GOLDEMBERG, Philadelphia, PA; JASON C.

2WHITE, Chicago, IL; MICHAEL BERCHOU, Harter Secrest & Emery, Buffalo, NY. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 13, 2021 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Power-Packer North America v. G.W. Lisk Company, Inc., No. 19-1902 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 13, 2021).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1902-20210413
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1902-20210413

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.