Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. v. Semicaps PTE Ltd., No. 19-1890 (Fed. Cir. June 15, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1890
Decided
June 15, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit HAMAMATSU PHOTONICS K.K.,

Appellant

v.

SEMICAPS PTE LTD.,

Appellee

2019-1890, 2019-1891

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-02110, IPR2017-02112.

JUDGMENT

JARED WESTON NEWTON, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by RYAN SETH GOLDSTEIN, Los Angeles, CA; DAVID EISEMAN, IV, San Francisco, CA; KOICHIRO MINAMINO, Minamino Law Office, PLLC, Washington, DC.

CAROLYN CHANG, Marton Ribera Schumann & Chang LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellee. Also represented by HECTOR JULIAN RIBERA, RYAN J. MARTON.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 15, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Hamamatsu Photonics K.K. v. Semicaps PTE Ltd., No. 19-1890 (Fed. Cir. June 15, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1890-20200615
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1890-20200615

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.