Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Consumer 2.0, Inc. v. Tenant Turner, Inc., No. 19-1846 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1846
Decided
March 9, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit CONSUMER 2.0, INC., DBA RENTLY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TENANT TURNER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1846

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 2:18-cv-00355-RGDDEM, Senior Judge Robert G. Doumar.

JUDGMENT

RUDOLPH A. TELSCHER, JR., Husch Blackwell LLP, St. Louis, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by KARA RENEE FUSSNER; STEPHEN VEGH, Vegh IP Legal, Manhattan Beach, CA. LAURIN HOWARD MILLS, Samek, Werther & Mills, LLC, Alexandria, VA, argued for defendant-appellee. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 9, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Consumer 2.0, Inc. v. Tenant Turner, Inc., No. 19-1846 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1846-20200309
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1846-20200309

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.