Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. v. Iancu, No. 19-1824 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1824
Decided
March 10, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit NIPPON SHINYAKU CO., LTD.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1824

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 1:10-cv-01142-EGS, United States District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

JUDGMENT

ANTHONY F. LO CICERO, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein LLP, New York, NY, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by MARION P. METELSKI, HOLLY PEKOWSKY. BRIAN RACILLA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for

2defendant-appellee. Also represented by KAKOLI CAPRIHAN, THOMAS W. KRAUSE.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 10, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Nippon Shinyaku Co., Ltd. v. Iancu, No. 19-1824 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1824-20200310
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1824-20200310

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.