Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., No. 19-1808 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 16, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1808
Decided
March 16, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
4 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TWITTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1808

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:18-cv-04523-LHK, United States District Judge Lucy H. Koh. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, DBA VERIZON

WIRELESS SERVICES LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1812

2Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:18-cv-06054-LHK, United States District Judge Lucy H. Koh. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

AT&T CORP.,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1813

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:18-cv-06177-LHK, United States District Judge Lucy H. Koh. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

VOIP-PAL.COM, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

APPLE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1814

3Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 5:18-cv-06217-LHK, United States District Judge Lucy H. Koh.

JUDGMENT

LEWIS EMERY HUDNELL, III, Hudnell Law Group PC, Mountain View, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. MARK ANDREW PERRY, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all defendants-appellees. Defendant-appellee Apple, Inc. also represented by ANDREW WILHELM; RYAN IWAHASHI, Palo Alto, CA; JOHN M. DESMARAIS, AMEET MODI, Desmarais LLP, New York, NY; PETER CURTIS MAGIC, San Francisco, CA. GENE WHAN LEE, Perkins Coie LLP, New York, NY, for defendant-appellee Twitter, Inc. Also represented by NATHAN K. KELLEY, Washington, DC. FRANK C. CIMINO, JR., Venable LLP, Washington, DC, for defendant-appellee Cellco Partnership. Also represented by MEGAN S. WOODWORTH; WILLIAM HECTOR, San Francisco, CA. MICHAEL HAWES, Baker Botts, LLP, Houston, TX, for defendant-appellee AT&T Corp. Also represented by LAUREN J. DREYER, Washington, DC. LEWIS EMERY HUDNELL, III, Hudnell Law Group PC, Mountain View, CA, for amici curiae Raymond A. Mercado, RPost Holdings, Incorporated, RPost Communications Limited, RMail Limited.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

4ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and O’MALLEY, Cir-

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 16, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Voip-Pal.Com, Inc. v. Twitter, Inc., No. 19-1808 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 16, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1808-20200316
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1808-20200316

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.