Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

In re Advanced Media Networks, LLC, No. 19-1766 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1766
Decided
November 6, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit IN RE: ADVANCED MEDIA NETWORKS, LLC,

Appellant 2019-1766

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 90/013,382.

JUDGMENT

SETH OSTROW, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTONIO PAPAGEORGIOU, Lombard & Geliebter LLP, New York, NY. WILLIAM LAMARCA, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Andrei Iancu. Also represented by THOMAS W. KRAUSE, FRANCES LYNCH.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

November 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

In re Advanced Media Networks, LLC, No. 19-1766 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 6, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1766-20201106
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1766-20201106

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.