Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

IYM Technologies LLC v. RPX Corporation, No. 19-1761 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1761
Decided
March 9, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

IYM TECHNOLOGIES LLC,

Appellant

v.

RPX CORPORATION, ADVANCED MICRO

DEVICES, INC.,

Appellees

2019-1761

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01886.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL DEVINCENZO, King & Wood Mallesons LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ROBERT WHITMAN, ANDREA PACELLI, CHARLES WIZENFELD. NATHAN R. SPEED, Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC, Boston, MA, argued for appellees. Also represented by RICHARD GIUNTA, BRYAN S. CONLEY, RANDY J. PRITZKER, ANANT KUMAR SARASWAT.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and HUGHES, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 9, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

IYM Technologies LLC v. RPX Corporation, No. 19-1761 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 9, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1761-20200309
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1761-20200309

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error