Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Shure Incorporated v. Clearone, Inc., No. 19-1755 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1755
Decided
March 6, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SHURE INCORPORATED,

Appellant

v.

CLEARONE, INC.,

Appellee

2019-1755

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01785.

JUDGMENT

MEREDITH MARTIN ADDY, AddyHart P.C., Atlanta, GA, argued for appellant. Also represented by HELEN DUTTON, Irvine, CA; ROBERT PATRICK HART, Chicago, IL; THOMAS J. CAMPBELL, JR., Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, LLP, Chicago, IL.

MATTHEW C. PHILLIPS, Laurence & Phillips IP Law LLP, Portland, OR, argued for appellee. Also represented by DEREK MEEKER; KEVIN BRENT LAURENCE, Washington, DC; XINLIN LI MORROW, The Morrow Firm, Los Angeles,

2CA; CHRISTINA MARIE RAYBURN, Hueston Hennigan LLP, Newport Beach, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Shure Incorporated v. Clearone, Inc., No. 19-1755 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 6, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1755-20200306
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1755-20200306

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.