Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. v. Tietex International Ltd., No. 19-1751 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1751
Decided
January 14, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit PRECISION FABRICS GROUP, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TIETEX INTERNATIONAL LTD.,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1751, 2019-1754

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina in Nos. 7:17-cv-03037-TDS, 7:17-cv-03038-TDS, Judge Thomas D. Schroeder.

JUDGMENT

LYNNE A. BORCHERS, Sage Patent Group, PLLC, Raleigh, NC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by PETER DANIEL SIDDOWAY; RICHARD A. COUGHLIN, Fox Rothschild LLP, Greensboro, NC. NEIL C. JONES, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough, LLP, Greenville, SC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by WILLIAM S. BROWN, SAMUEL W. OUTTEN; ASHLEY BOLAND SUMMER, New York, NY.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Precision Fabrics Group, Inc. v. Tietex International Ltd., No. 19-1751 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1751-20200114
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1751-20200114

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error