Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Ford Global Technologies, LLC v. NEW World International, Inc., No. 19-1746 (Fed. Cir. June 22, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1746
Decided
June 22, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

NEW WORLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., AUTO

LIGHTHOUSE PLUS, LLC, UNITED COMMERCE

CENTERS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellants

2019-1746

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in No. 3:17-cv-03201-N, United States District Judge David C. Godbey.

JUDGMENT

JESSICA LYNN ELLSWORTH, Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellee. Also represented by KIRTI DATLA, REEDY SWANSON; MARC LORELLI, Brooks Kushman PC, Southfield, MI. ROBERT GLENN OAKE, JR., Oake Law Office, Allen, TX, argued for defendants-appellants.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 22, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Ford Global Technologies, LLC v. NEW World International, Inc., No. 19-1746 (Fed. Cir. June 22, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1746-20200622
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1746-20200622

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.