Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Diem LLC v. Bigcommerce, Inc., No. 19-1745 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1745
Decided
February 6, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

DIEM LLC,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

BIGCOMMERCE, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant

2019-1745

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:18-cv-05978-SI, Senior Judge Susan Y. Illston.

JUDGMENT

BRETT RISMILLER, Husky Finch, St. Louis, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellee. AMIT AGARWAL, Tampa, FL, argued for defendant-appellant. Also represented by WILLIAM ROBERT LAMB, Gillam & Smith, LLP, Marshall, TX. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 6, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Diem LLC v. Bigcommerce, Inc., No. 19-1745 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 6, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1745-20200206
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1745-20200206

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.