Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Google LLC v. Netlist, Inc., No. 19-1720 (Fed. Cir. June 15, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1720
Decided
June 15, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GOOGLE LLC, INPHI CORPORATION,

Appellants

v.

NETLIST, INC.,

Appellee

2019-1720, 2019-1721

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. 95/000,578, 95/000,579, 95/001,339.

JUDGMENT

DORIS JOHNSON HINES, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Washington, DC, argued for all appellants. Appellant Google LLC also represented by CHEN ZANG; JASON E. STACH, Atlanta, GA. DAVID A. JAKOPIN, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Palo Alto, CA, for appellant Inphi Corporation. Also represented by ROGER R. WISE, Los Angeles, CA; ROBERT M. FUHRER, McLean, VA.

2SETH W. LLOYD, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by BRIAN ROBERT MATSUI; MEHRAN ARJOMAND, Los Angeles, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

cuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

June 15, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Google LLC v. Netlist, Inc., No. 19-1720 (Fed. Cir. June 15, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1720-20200615
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1720-20200615

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.