Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc., No. 19-1662 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1662
Decided
March 10, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SUPERCELL OY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GREE, INC., GREE INTERNATIONAL

ENTERTAINMENT, INC., FUNZIO GAMES, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2019-1662

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:17-cv-05556-YGR, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers.

JUDGMENT

MICHAEL JOHN SACKSTEDER, Fenwick & West, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by BRYAN ALEXANDER KOHM; CRYSTAL ADA NWANERI, Mountain View, CA; GEOFFREY ROBERT MILLER, New York, NY. JOHN C. ALEMANNI, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Raleigh, NC, argued for defendants-appellees. Also represented by STEVEN MOORE, TAYLOR JACQUELINE

2PFINGST, San Francisco, CA; ANDREW WILLIAM RINEHART, Winston-Salem, NC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and

MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 10, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Supercell Oy v. GREE, Inc., No. 19-1662 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 10, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1662-20200310
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1662-20200310

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error