Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

General Access Solutions, Ltd. v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 19-1565 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1565
Decided
May 15, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit GENERAL ACCESS SOLUTIONS, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

UNIFIED PATENTS, LLC,

Appellee

2019-1565

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01178.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL TAYLOR, Bartlit Beck LLP, Denver, CO, argued for appellant. Also represented by GLEN E. SUMMERS, JOHN HUGHES, NOSSON KNOBLOCH; ANTHONY DOWELL, McCaulley Dowell LLP, Chicago, IL. BRITTANY BLUEITT AMADI, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID LANGDON CAVANAUGH, GREGORY H. LANTIER, DANIEL V. WILLIAMS; ASHRAF FAWZY,

2JONATHAN RUDOLPH KOMINEK STROUD, Unified Patents, LLC, Washington, DC. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, REYNA, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

May 15, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

General Access Solutions, Ltd. v. Unified Patents, LLC, No. 19-1565 (Fed. Cir. May 15, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1565-20200515
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1565-20200515

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error