Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Spring Ventures, Ltd. v. Google LLC, No. 19-1542 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 3, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1542
Decided
March 3, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

SPRING VENTURES, LTD.,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

2019-1542

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01653.

JUDGMENT

SETH OSTROW, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTONIO PAPAGEORGIOU, SARAH PFEIFFER.

DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN; KEYNA T. CHOW, East Palo Alto, CA; ASIM BHANSALI, Kwun Bhansali Lazarus LLP, San Francisco, CA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 3, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Spring Ventures, Ltd. v. Google LLC, No. 19-1542 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 3, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1542-20200303
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1542-20200303

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.