Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Aptiv Services 5 US, LLC v. Microchip Technology, Inc., No. 19-1537 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 5, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1537
Decided
March 5, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

APTIV SERVICES 5 US, LLC,

Appellant

v.

MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Cross-Appellant

2019-1537, 2019-1538, 2019-1601, 2019-1603 Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-00861, IPR2017-00864.

JUDGMENT

SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellant. Also represented by DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER; JAMES LAWRENCE DAVIS, JR., HENRY HUANG, East Palo Alto, CA. BRIAN C. BANNER, Slayden Grubert Beard PLLC, Austin, TX, argued for cross-appellant. Also represented by BRUCE W. SLAYDEN, II.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

March 5, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Aptiv Services 5 US, LLC v. Microchip Technology, Inc., No. 19-1537 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 5, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1537-20200305
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1537-20200305

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error