Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Klaustech, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 19-1536 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1536
Decided
February 12, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KLAUSTECH, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1536

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 4:10-cv-05899-JSW, Judge Jeffrey S. White.

JUDGMENT

NICOLE E. GLAUSER, DiNovo, Price, Ellwanger & Hardy LLP, Austin, TX, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by ANDREW DINOVO. DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by HENRY HUANG, East Palo Alto, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, CHEN, and STOLL, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 12, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Klaustech, Inc. v. Google LLC, No. 19-1536 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 12, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1536-20200212
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1536-20200212

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error