Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Wesley Corporation v. Zoom T.V. Products, No. 19-1477 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1477
Decided
December 11, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit WESLEY CORPORATION, DAVID HANSON,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ZOOM T.V. PRODUCTS, IDEAVILLAGE

PRODUCTS CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees

2019-1477

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in No. 2:17-cv-10021-RHC-SDD, Judge Robert H. Cleland.

JUDGMENT

DANIEL MCCARTHY, Butzel Long, Bloomfield Hills, MI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. JOSHUA GARY LATZMAN, Miller Canfield Paddock & Stone PLC, Troy, MI, argued for defendants-appellees. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and

WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Wesley Corporation v. Zoom T.V. Products, No. 19-1477 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1477-20191211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1477-20191211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error