Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Faro v. Iancu, No. 19-1476 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1476
Decided
February 11, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

JOHN H. FARO,

Petitioner-Appellant

v.

ANDREI IANCU, UNDER SECRETARY OF

COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY

AND DIRECTOR OF THE UNITED STATES

PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE,

Respondent-Appellee

2019-1476

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in No. 1:18-cv-00274-AJTTCB, Judge Anthony J. Trenga.

JUDGMENT

JOHN H. FARO, Faro & Associates, Miami, FL, argued pro se. CATHERINE YANG, Office of the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, United States Department of Justice, Alexandria, VA, argued for respondent-appellee. Also represented by G. ZACHARY TERWILLIGER;

2THOMAS W. KRAUSE, Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

February 11, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Faro v. Iancu, No. 19-1476 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 11, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1476-20200211
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1476-20200211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.