Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., No. 19-1419 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 3, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1419
Decided
August 3, 2020
Judge
Per curiam
Document
Nonprecedential Opinion
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ILLUMINA, INC., SEQUENOM, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellants

v.

ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC., ROCHE

SEQUENCING SOLUTIONS, INC., ROCHE

MOLECULAR SYSTEMS, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees

2019-1419

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:18-cv-02847-SI, Senior Judge Susan Y. Illston.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before PROST, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, WALLACH, TARANTO, CHEN,

and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.*

22 ILLUMINA, INC. v. ARIOSA DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

O R D E R

Appellees Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., Roche Sequencing Solutions, Inc., and Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellants Illumina, Inc. and Sequenom, Inc. The petition for rehearing and response were first referred to the panel that heard the appeal, which granted the petition in part as indicated in the accompanying order. Thereafter, the petition was referred to the circuit judges who are in regular active service.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1) The petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

2) The mandate of the court will issue on September

9, 2020.

FOR THE COURT

August 3, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Footnotes

  1. * Circuit Judge Stoll did not participate.

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Illumina, Inc. v. Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., No. 19-1419 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 3, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1419-20200803-1
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1419-20200803-1

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.