Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 19-1353 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2020)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1353
Decided
January 14, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

EGENERA, INC.,

Appellant

v.

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,

Appellee

2019-1353

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01340.

JUDGMENT

JAMES ELROY QUIGLEY, McKool Smith, PC, Austin, TX, argued for appellant. Also represented by JOHN BRUCE CAMPBELL, KATHY HSINJUNG LI; CHRISTOPHER THOR BOVENKAMP, Dallas, TX. THEODORE M. FOSTER, Haynes & Boone, LLP, Dallas, TX, argued for appellee. Also represented by DAVID L. MCCOMBS, DEBRA JANECE MCCOMAS.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 14, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc., No. 19-1353 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 14, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1353-20200114
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1353-20200114

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.