Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Blacklidge Emulsions, Inc. v. Asphalt Products Unlimited, No. 19-1349 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 26, 2019)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1349
Decided
December 26, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit BLACKLIDGE EMULSIONS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ASPHALT PRODUCTS UNLIMITED, INC.,

Appellee

2019-1349, 2019-1350

Appeals from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2017-01241, IPR2017-01242.

JUDGMENT

JOHN FRANCIS TRIGGS, Patterson Intellectual Property Law, PC, Nashville, TN, argued for appellant. Also represented by MARK ANDREW KILGORE, RYAN D. LEVY, SETH R. OGDEN, WILLIAM E. SEKYI.

MICHAEL K. LEACHMAN, Jones Walker LLP, Baton Rouge, LA, argued for appellee. Also represented by ROBERT WADDELL, Lafayette, LA.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, MOORE, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 26, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Blacklidge Emulsions, Inc. v. Asphalt Products Unlimited, No. 19-1349 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 26, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1349-20191226
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1349-20191226

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error