Fed. Cir.

Kneebinding, Inc. v. Marker Volkl USA, Inc., No. 19-1341 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2019)

Rule 36 Affirmance

Court: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.: No. 19-1341
Decided: December 11, 2019
Judge: Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document: Rule 36 Judgment
Length: 2 pages

Full Text Analysis Cite this Opinion

Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

KNEEBINDING, INC.,

Appellant

MARKER VOLKL USA, INC.,

Appellee

2019-1341

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01265.

JUDGMENT

JAMIE GALLAGHER, Birch Tree IP Law & Strategy PLLC, Essex, VT, argued for appellant. ANTHONY JAMES FITZPATRICK, Duane Morris LLP, Boston, MA, argued for appellee. Also represented by PATRICK D. MCPHERSON, Washington, DC.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

2ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, TARANTO and

STOLL, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 11, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Kneebinding, Inc. v. Marker Volkl USA, Inc., No. 19-1341 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 11, 2019).

Record ID: CAFC-19-1341-20191211
Permalink: https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1341-20191211

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error