Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Telesign Corporation v. Twilio, Inc., No. 19-1312 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1312
Decided
January 9, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

TELESIGN CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

TWILIO, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1312

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 3:18-cv-03279-VC, Judge Vince Chhabria.

JUDGMENT

JESSE J. CAMACHO, Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Kansas City, MO, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by RYAN DYKAL, CHRISTINE A. GUASTELLO; GARY MICHAEL MILLER, Chicago, IL. WAYNE O. STACY, Baker Botts LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by SARAH J. GUSKE; LAUREN J. DREYER, Washington, DC.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 9, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Telesign Corporation v. Twilio, Inc., No. 19-1312 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 9, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1312-20200109
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1312-20200109

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error