Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ispeaker Co., Ltd., No. 19-1292 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1292
Decided
April 17, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit SPIGEN KOREA CO., LTD., A REPUBLIC OF

KOREA CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

ISPEAKER CO., LTD., A REPUBLIC OF KOREA

CORPORATION, VRS DESIGN, INC., A

CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees

DOES, 1 THROUGH 10, INCLUSIVE,

Defendant 2019-1292

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in No. 2:16-cv-08559-DOC-DFM, Judge David O. Carter.

JUDGMENT

KAREN KIM, Lucem PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by HEEDONG CHAE.

2MICHAEL EISENBERG, Holland & Knight, LLP, New York, NY, argued for defendants-appellees. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (NEWMAN, LOURIE, and REYNA, Circuit

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 17, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Spigen Korea Co., Ltd. v. Ispeaker Co., Ltd., No. 19-1292 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 17, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1292-20200417
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1292-20200417

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error