Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Arsus, LLC v. John H. Firmage, Inc., No. 19-1224 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2019)

Affirmed
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1224
Decided
October 4, 2019
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

ARSUS, LLC, A UTAH ENTITY,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

JOHN H. FIRMAGE, INC., A UTAH ENTITY, DBA

BMW OF MURRAY,

Defendant-Appellee

2019-1224

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Utah in No. 1:17-cv-00125-DB, Senior Judge Dee V. Benson.

JUDGMENT

PATRICK BRIGHT, Wagner, Anderson & Bright, PC, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by TODD E. ZENGER, Duren IP, PC, Salt Lake City, UT.

JOSEPH P. LAVELLE, DLA Piper US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

October 4, 2019 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Arsus, LLC v. John H. Firmage, Inc., No. 19-1224 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 4, 2019).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1224-20191004
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1224-20191004

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.