Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Weekly Digest
Fed. Cir.

Blackberry Ltd. v. Google LLC, No. 19-1145 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2020)

Affirmed
Rule 36 Affirmance
Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Case No.
No. 19-1145
Decided
January 13, 2020
Judge
Per curiam (Rule 36)
Document
Rule 36 Judgment
Length
2 pages
Download Opinion (PDF)

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals

for the Federal Circuit

BLACKBERRY LTD.,

Appellant

v.

GOOGLE LLC,

Appellee

2019-1145

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-00913.

JUDGMENT

CHING-LEE FUKUDA, Sidley Austin LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by SHARON LEE; SAMUEL DILLON, Washington, DC. NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by PHILLIP W. CITROEN, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, SEONGHEE EMILY LEE, JOSEPH PALYS.

2THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, MOORE and

HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

January 13, 2020 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court

Text extracted from the official PDF and reflowed for reading. It is not a certified transcript — the PDF linked above is the authoritative document.

Analysis is coming soon.

A plain-English account of the issues, facts and holding, written by Patent Case Watch. The opinion itself — its full text, its PDF and everything else on this page — stays free to read for everyone, always.

Cite this opinion

Blackberry Ltd. v. Google LLC, No. 19-1145 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 13, 2020).

Record ID
CAFC-19-1145-20200113
Permalink
https://patentcasewatch.com/opinions/CAFC-19-1145-20200113

No reporter citation is shown because the official source does not supply one; none is inferred here. Check the opinion and a citator before relying on this form.

Source: Federal Circuit opinions and orders · retrieved August 15, 2026 · Report an error